Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Fashion’

Wakanda is no bull$&@/ country

The Black Panther [2018] is Marvel Universe’s latest comic adaptation , and has garnered much public fanfare / revenue along with high acclaim from cinematic pundits . The film tells the tale of the native, fictional country of Wakanda . . . And, like any decent superhero screenplay, a good narrative should include [ORKA] an Origin / Creation Story, an account of the Royal Kingdom / Lineage, and an epic-concluding Armageddon, or the world’s final battle.

Elements of a Good Narrative

O – Origin / Creation Story

RK – Royal Kingdom

A – Armageddon/ Final Battle

There exists disagreement among surveyors of art regarding interpretation: An Intentionalist View of whether art is to be interpreted by the lens of the creator(s) versus a Subjectivist perspective upon whether art lies in the eye of the beholder.  The strengths of the former position lie in the authority of the creator to determine his/her perspective, and the inherent authority of the driving, creative force(s). The inherent motivations behind the latter view rest in the actual evidence of changing interpretations of artwork over time; the corresponding drawback of the intentionalist position involves the consequence that it makes the meaning of a work quite rigid and static.

Ruth Tallman advances a compromise: A view she labels Multiplism, which acknowledges authorial intentions among equal possibilities of other interpretations.

Does Plato Wear Prada?

In The Devil Wears Prada (2006), a young woman who shuns the latest styles comes to New York and nonchalantly lands a job as an assistant to the ruthless Miranda Priestly, the city’s biggest fashion magazine editor.

People often retreat into an all-too-familiar glazed look when exposed to either the technical details of the garment industry or, in our case, the subtle distinctions of grand ethical theories.

Miranda rebuts this kind of thinking when she ‘dresses down’ Andrea for scoffing when one of the fashion designers holds up two nearly identical belts and asserts that they are so different:

I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet, and you select out . . . that lumpy blue sweater . . . But what you don’t know is that sweater is not just blue, it’s not turquoise, it’s not lapis, it’s actually cerulean.  You’re also blithely unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar De La Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. And then I think it was Yves Saint Laurent who showed cerulean military jackets . . . and then cerulean quickly showed up in the collections of eight different designers. Then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down to some tragic casual corner where you no doubt fished it out of some clearance bin. However, that blue represents millions of dollars and countless jobs, and it’s sort of comical how you think you made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry when in fact you’re wearing the sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room from a pile of ‘stuff.’

Andrea makes the mistake of referring to Miranda’s serious work as “stuff.” The fashion industry sows, the academy deliberates, and the masses reap the long-term consequences. The results remain similar regardless of the industry, profession, or movement. Miranda’s rant illustrates the descent of modern cerulean and, to a larger extent, the implications of ideas that filter their way from the ivory tower down to the city streets.

Men, women, and their grand ideas renowned in their tight-knit circles: Aristotle’s observations on virtue, Thomas Hobbes’ egoism, David Hume’s influence on relativism, Immanuel Kant’s deontological imprint, John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism, and Carol Gilligan’s recent reflections on care all shape modern ethical thought and moral decision making.

Our ethical beliefs may seem as if they are fished out of some moral clearance bin, but they actually represent timeless principles which have outlasted their respective historical principals.

It is a devilish, Platonic, Pradaic (sic) effect that ideas do matter and leave lasting consequences.